Run the same emission-capture attack against both of Bittensor's allocation regimes: a refundable constant-product price pump (dTAO, pre-Nov 2025) versus an EMA-smoothed staking flow with a 30-day half-life (TaoFlow). Real protocol constants show why one pays instantly and the other decays.
Emission Engine — drag the sliders — attack budget, pool depth, baseline share, network inflow · tab to a slider and use arrow keys for fine stepsopen artifact ↗
Bittensor let AMM prices decide which AI subnets earn 3,600 TAO a day — until a memecoin subnet gamed the formula. Inside the TaoFlow upgrade: the constant-product math that got exploited, the EMA flow accounting that replaced it, and why refundable manipulation is the design smell to hunt for.